WWW.BOOK.DISLIB.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Books, dissertations, abstract
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 || 3 |

«Edward P. Clapp Towards a New Concept of Arts Education: Second World Conference on Arts Education; Seoul, Korea Harvard University, USA ...»

-- [ Page 2 ] --

Deasy is quick to point out that these assumptions may not have existed twenty, fifteen, or even ten years-ago, and that while these assumptions may appear to be universal, not all people within the arts may agree with them. 4 This note by Deasy wisely suggests that the core assumptions of a given field are both ephemeral and subject to individual experience.

Assumptions, as per Deasy’s suggestions, (a) are constantly up for review and revision and, (b) may be generalized over a larger population/community, but deviations will always exist within that population/community.

Building off of Deasy’s foundational assumptions for the field of arts education, my colleagues Ann Gregg, Nancy Kleaver, Heath Marlow, and I sought to further define the parameters of the field’s core assumptions by “teasing-out” the categories into which such

                                                        

Strict religious beliefs likewise contributed to the maintenance of these widely held assumptions.

Richard J. Deasy. Presentation at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. April 6, 2009. Cambridge, MA.

assumptions may be considered. In our 2009 presentation at the AEP Fall Forum we delineated the core assumptions of the field of arts education into three discrete categories. We redefined the notion of “core assumptions” as the “prevailing purposes, procedures, and principles that influence leadership and practice” (Clapp, et al., 2009). In doing so, we built upon the notion that an assumption is an unvalidated truth that is up for constant revision, and that these truths stand as generalizations held over a field that may either add nuance or utterly disagree with any given assumption.

Purposes

Core assumptions that address the purposes of arts education discuss why we do the work we do. These assumptions answer questions beginning with the word why. Why engage in arts education? Why advocate for arts education? Why is arts education important? These assumptions held by the field, then, are not the question of why—but

the answer. For example:

Question: Why is arts education important?

Answer: Arts education is important because it provides students with the opportunities to express their creative capacities.

Core Assumption: Arts education provides students with opportunities to express their creativity.

Question: Why advocate for arts education?

Answer: We should advocate for the proliferation of arts education because arts education experiences make our citizens more skilled workers capable of addressing the demands of the 21st Century workplace.

Core Assumption: Arts education provides students with the skills they will need to excel in the 21st Century workplace.

Procedures Core assumptions that address the procedures of arts education concern themselves with how we do the work we do, who provides these services, where should arts education take place, and what encompasses an arts education experience. These assumptions answer the question of how, who, where, and what. How do students experience arts education?

How should arts education be funded? How does arts education fold itself into broader curricular structures? Who administers an arts education experience? Where should arts education take place? What should an arts education experience entail? As with the purposes of arts education, the core assumptions surrounding the procedures of arts education are not the question of how, who, where, and what—but rather the answers to

these questions. For example:

Question: How should arts education be funded?

Answer: Arts education should be funded by the public because the cultural enrichment of a community is the responsibility of every citizen.

Core Assumption: Arts education should be publicly funded.

Question: Where should arts education take place?

Answer: Arts education should take place in public schools and be accessible to all students.

Core Assumption: Arts education should take place in public schools.

Principles Core assumptions that address the principles of arts education are related to the underlying theories that support the field. Deasy’s core assumption that “students learn in multiple ways and the arts provide multiple pathways for their doing so” indirectly assumes the importance of Howard Gardner’s (1982) theory of multiple intelligences. In the last forty years of arts education history there have been many theoretical models that have undergirded the assumptions of the field in different ways. Discipline-Based Arts Education (Getty Center for Education in the Arts, 1987), Arts Integration, “Arts for Arts Sake,” Artful Thinking (Project Zero, n.d.), Studio Thinking (Hetland et al., 2007), Visual Thinking Strategies (Housen & Yenawine, 2001), and 21st Century Skills (Partnership for 21st Century Skills, 2004) are amongst such theoretical frameworks.

Who’s Got Core Assumptions?

The language around core assumptions is deceptively complex in its simplicity. If I were to ask: “Do you have core assumptions about the field of arts education?” “Sure I do!” Might be your answer. “Perhaps you do,” Kegan and Lahey (2009) may say (and I would be in agreement with them), “but it’s more likely that your core assumptions have you.” Functioning as underlying truths that guide our decision-making, our core assumptions are not ideas we generally have. At least, we don’t have them in the sense that we can control them. They have us. The locus of control is with the assumptions—not with the individual.





The goal of identifying one’s core assumptions is, indeed, to take back that control from your core assumptions, to no longer be had by your core assumptions about the field of arts education, but to have your core assumptions, to hold them. Kegan and Lahey talk about this concept of being had vs. having an assumption in terms of subject and object.

When you’re core assumptions have you, you are subject to them. You operate in accordance with their parameters, you take them as truth, you formulate your actions and decisions based upon the frameworks your assumptions have set for you. They are at the core of how you know, experience, and operate within the field of arts education.

When you have your core assumptions, you have moved them from subject to object. You are no longer subject to your core assumptions once you are able to step outside of them and hold them as you would any other sort of object. It is at this point, when you can hold your core assumptions as object, that you can then begin to scrutinize them, question their validity, or perhaps dismiss them altogether.

Challenging Core Assumptions

The above examples of core assumptions were not designed to be universal, but instead designed to be emblematic of what certain individuals in the field of arts education may assume to be undeniable truths. Universal or not, resorting to generalizations helps us talk about broader swaths of a population. Whether these generalizations of core assumptions ring true for all, or many, or none, is separate (but related) to the key point that, as long as these assumptions and others like them are held to be true, the system—the field of arts education—can only function within their parameters. Problems confronting the field can only be addressed with the technical expertise that these assumptions warrant. In an instance where an adaptive challenge faces the field of arts education in a way that leaps beyond the field’s core assumptions, the assumptions of the field must change—what the field understands to be true must be altered in order to meet these challenges.

Let’s take one of Dick Deasy’s core assumptions that was mentioned earlier: “Arts education is underfunded at federal, state, and local levels.” If we accept this core assumption to be true, if we are subject to this core assumption, then we must operate within its parameters. This assumption suggests to us that as a field we will always operate from a position of scarcity, we will never have the full resources necessary to live out our greater visions, and therefore we must compromise ourselves and our programming. The assumption, in essence, limits our ability to progress.

However, if we step outside of this assumption and move this assumption from having us to us having it, then we can begin to problematize the validity of this assumption. We can then ask ourselves why we believe this is true. We will certainly come up with some very good reasons. That’s the assumption protecting itself, fighting to stay at the core of our meaning making, struggling to retain its control.

The next step in our process may be to ask ourselves, “what would it take for this core assumption to no longer be true?” This is the first movement towards developing adaptive expertise geared at overcoming an adaptive challenge. By asking ourselves what it would take for arts education to operate from a position of plenty, we are not calling upon technical routine know-how, we are forcing ourselves to think adaptively about our own field. We are moving from survival-based quick-fix approaches to problem solving, to paradigm shifting visions of reconstituting the field anew.

One of the challenges facing the field of arts education that I have noted is a disconnect between how 21st Century students naturally express themselves in a digital world, and the arts disciplines that are traditionally made available to them in-school and through afterschool programs. 5 Perhaps a core assumption being maintained by the field is that the primary disciplines of arts education are visual art, dance, theatre, and music. The field is subject to this notion. As long as the field on a whole accepts this as truth, the disconnect stated in the challenge to the field will continue. It is not until we challenge this core assumption that we can begin to address this disconnect and more effectively provide students with digital arts learning experiences that better correlate with their interests and personal aptitudes. One can see that replacing visual art, dance, theatre, and music with digital media arts would indeed require a paradigm shift in the field—an adaptive change.

“Hold on a second,” one of you may say, “I don’t think visual art, dance, theatre, and music are the primary disciplines of arts education. I’ve been a digital artist for years. I don’t hold these core assumptions!” Of course you don’t! The core assumptions of the field are overarching generalizations that are not individual-specific, but are instead an amalgamation of the assumed truths held by many. You may have your own personal set of core assumptions and the field of arts education may have an entirely different set. Those with more influence than others, however, dictate the field’s greater core assumptions. They determine, based on their values and what they hold to be true, how the field will act, what the field will believe, what arts education—writ large—will hold as truth.

How does this happen?

                                                        

See Appendix A: A Short-List of Challenges Affecting the Field of Arts Education.

The core assumptions of the field of arts education are expressed in a variety of ways.

When the field’s professional associations announce a theme for an upcoming conference, the field asserts its core assumptions. When the editors of the field’s professional journals publish articles discussing certain topics and not others, the field asserts its core assumptions. When the field’s largest funding bodies release an RFP for programs focused on a given topic, the field asserts its core assumptions.

It can be argued that the core assumptions of the field of arts education are expressed from the top-down. Therefore, challenging the field’s core assumptions not only requires us to shift said assumptions from having us to us having them, it also relies upon our ability to surface the values, beliefs, and visions of those on the bottom. The question then is: who’s on top, who’s on the bottom, and what’s going on in the vast middle?

Conclusion: The Great Stage Dive of Change



Pages:     | 1 || 3 |


Similar works:

«Andrej Holm/Dirk Gebhardt (Hrsg.) Initiativen für ein Recht auf Stadt Theorie und Praxis städtischer Aneignungen V VS Andrej Holm/Dirk Gebhardt (Hrsg.) Initiativen für ein Recht auf Stadt Simone Buckel arbeitet an einem Dissertationsprojekt zum Thema »Urban Governance und irreguläre Migration« am Georg-Simmel-Zentrum für Metropolenforschung Berlin. Jan Dohnke ist Doktorand am Geographischen Institut der Freien Universität Berlin. Benjamin Etzold ist wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am...»

«The T–Vote Protocol R. Ara´jo, A. Wiesmaier, J. Buchmann u TU Darmstadt — Cryptography and Computeralgebra Hochschulstr. 10, D–64289 Darmstadt Abstract We present a secure e–voting protocol using voting booths. A noteworthy attribute of the protocol is that the validator and the tallier are not considered as trustworthy. After defining the protocol we discuss its security within the scope of the commonly agreed security requirements for voting schemes. 1 Introduction This document...»

«National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cape Cod National Seashore Guide’s Guide Marconi Station Location Summary Directions: Six miles north of Salt Pond Visitor Center, off Route 6 in Wellfleet (look for brown and white signs). Safety: Watch for bicyclists along Route 6, and where the bicycle trail crosses the Marconi area entrance road. Do not walk on the edge of, or beneath, cliff faces. Other: Restrooms are available seasonally at the Marconi Station Site and Marconi Beach....»

«Strategy for Lifelong Learning in the Federal Republic of Germany Bonn : BLK 2004, 28 S. (Materials on educational planning and research promotion; 115) Empfohlene Zitierung/ Suggested Citation: Strategy for Lifelong Learning in the Federal Republic of Germany. Bonn : BLK 2004, 28 S. (Materials on educational planning and research promotion; 115) URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-opus-1596 Nutzungsbedingungen Terms of use Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, persönliches We grant a...»

«From “Grass-Mud Horse” to “Citizen”: A New Generation Emerges through China’s Social Media Space Written Presentation of XIAO Qiang, Founder and Chief Editor, China Digital Times, Adjunct Professor, Graduate School of Journalism, University of California at Berkeley. Before The Congressional-Executive Commission on China’s hearing “China's Censorship of the Internet and Social Media: The Human Toll and Trade Impact” on Thursday, November 17, Washington, DC. Respectful Chairman,...»

«'Art thou my Boy?: Skepticism, Childhood and Ceremonies of Initiation.' Sarah Beckwith Mamillius appears only briefly in The Winter's Tale yet he haunts the entire play. Stanley Cavell has made us familiar with the idea that Leontes is the portrait of a skeptic, and the play involves us in delicate and complex recoveries from skepticism, or ways of living with it that will not be soul-destroying. In this sense the play is post-skeptical. But through the investigation of the figure of Mamillius,...»

«Schriftenreihe der Heeresunteroffiziersakademie Ausgabe 11 ENCOA 2007 Dieser Band enthält die besten Arbeiten aus dem Weiterbildungslehrgang für Stabsunteroffiziere 2006, die über das Projekt ENCOA („European Non Commissioned Officer Academy“) von deutschen und österreichischen Unteroffizieren erstellt wurden sowie aktuelle Informationen zu ENCOA. Besonderer Dank ergeht an Mag. Petra BOHNSTEIGER und Frau Susan GEIBLINGER für die umfangreichen Unterstützungen bei der redaktionellen...»

«2006R2023 — DE — 17.04.2008 — 001.001 — 1 Dieses Dokument ist lediglich eine Dokumentationsquelle, für deren Richtigkeit die Organe der Gemeinschaften keine Gewähr übernehmen ►B VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 2023/2006 DER KOMMISSION vom 22. Dezember 2006 über gute Herstellungspraxis für Materialien und Gegenstände, die dazu bestimmt sind, mit Lebensmitteln in Berührung zu kommen (Text von Bedeutung für den EWR) (ABl. L 384 vom 29.12.2006, S. 75) Geändert durch: Amtsblatt Nr. Seite...»

«Migration and Job Change Decisions in Times of Strongly Rising Energy Prices – The Microsimulation Model €LAN Eva Gerhards, Anna Rauch and Max Bohnet* June 2012 * We thank Thiago Guimarães and Gesa Matthes and all other members of the €LAN project for commenting and Dinah Schmechel for proof-reading.Corresponding authors: Eva Gerhards Finanzwissenschaftliches Forschungsinstitut an der Universität zu Köln (FiFo) Wörthstr. 26, D-50668 Köln E-mail: gerhards@fifo-koeln.de Anna Rauch...»

«Anlage 3 zur Bekanntmachung des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit zu § 2 Nr. 3 der Arzneimittelund Wirkstoffherstellungsverordnung – AMWHV – vom 18. Juli 2008 (BAnz. S. 2798) Anhang 20 zum EG-Leitfaden der Guten Herstellungspraxis1 Qualitäts-Risikomanagement Datum des Inkrafttretens: -2Vorwort und Anwendungsbereich Der neue Anhang 20 zum EG-GMP Leitfaden entspricht der ICH Q9-Leitlinie zum QualitätsRisikomanagement. Er bietet Anleitung über einen systematischen Zugang zum...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.book.dislib.info - Free e-library - Books, dissertations, abstract

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.