WWW.BOOK.DISLIB.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Books, dissertations, abstract
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 || 3 | 4 |

«CIPM MRA-D-05 Version 1.6 Measurement comparisons in the context of the CIPM MRA CIPM MRA-D-05 Contents 1. Background 1.1. On the CIPM MRA 2. ...»

-- [ Page 2 ] --

According to paragraph 6 of the CIPM MRA:

6 Participation in key and supplementary comparisons

–  –  –

Committees should take proper account of regional representation. The number of laboratories participating in CIPM key comparisons may be restricted for technical reasons.

6.2 Participation in key comparisons organized by an RMO is open to all RMO members and to other institutes that meet the rules of the regional organization (including institutes invited from outside the region) and that have technical competence appropriate to the particular comparison.

6.3 Participation in RMO supplementary comparisons is open to those institutes meeting the requirements specified in paragraph 6.2.

At its 2005 meeting, the CIPM decided on the following policy concerning the participation of laboratories in Associates of the CGPM6.

 paragraph 1.5 of the CIPM MRA should be interpreted with greater flexibility than before. Any participation of NMIs and designated institutes from Associates in CC comparisons or other activities should be carefully considered by the relevant committee or working group on a case by case basis. Specifically and in exceptional cases Associates may be invited to take part in CC comparisons, studies, pilots and

other formal activities where:

–  –  –

 that reports of CC comparisons in which NMIs and other designated institutes from Associates take part may be included in the KCDB although these reports should make clear those results which come from Associates. Their results should not normally contribute to a key comparison reference value in comparisons which are CIPM 2005-05, paragraph 2.4. In the text, CC refers to Consultative Committees and KC refers to key comparisons.

–  –  –

arranged by the Consultative Committee unless it may be shown to be of significant scientific value to other participants;

 Associates who are invited to take part in a KC organized by a Consultative Committee may be invited to attend working group meetings at which the results from that comparison are discussed;

 that representatives of NMIs or DIs from Associates may be invited, on a one-off, case by case basis, to attend CCs or working groups as guests; and  Associates may be asked to pay, as provided for under Article 15 (1921) of the Convention of the Metre, for any extra costs incurred by the BIPM of their participation in comparisons, particularly those which are piloted by the BIPM.

It is important to note that a national metrology institute (NMI) or designated institute (DI) that has never participated in a comparison may wish to acquire a benchmark of its performance before participating in a key comparison. This can be achieved by running pilot studies in parallel to a key or supplementary comparison or by participating in a key or supplementary comparison in “pilot study” mode. The results of the NMIs or DIs participating in the pilot study are not to be used to compute reference values, and the name of the institute will not be published in the KCDB. Participation in “pilot studies” run in parallel to comparisons must be agreed before the comparison measurements starts. Results from pilot studies are not considered sufficient support of CMCs.

–  –  –

4.2. Initiating a CIPM key comparison CIPM key comparisons are initiated at a Consultative Committee meeting.

The Consultative Committee at each of its meetings examines the need for comparisons and decides which ones from a list of key comparisons should be initiated at that meeting, taking into account, among other things, the views of regional metrology organizations. For each comparison, a pilot institute is identified to take the main responsibility for running the CIPM key comparison.

In drawing up the provisional list of participants and an approximate timetable, the Consultative Committee ensures that an adequate number of participants from each of the

–  –  –

main RMOs take part so that corresponding regional comparisons can be properly linked to the CIPM comparison.

In some CIPM key comparisons the number of participants may be limited for technical reasons.

The Consultative Committee may form a coordinating group, nominating two or three institutes from the provisional list to help the pilot institute in drawing up the technical protocol and timetable for the comparison.

The timetable of this and any other comparisons decided by the Consultative Committee should be discussed to ensure that the workload of the whole set is not too great for the participating and pilot institutes, and that the results will be available for the next meeting, normally in three (or occasionally two) years’ time. For this the total circulation time of the standards must be fixed and should not exceed eighteen months unless there are exceptional circumstances.

–  –  –

4.3. Organization of a CIPM key comparison The organization of a CIPM key comparison is the responsibility of the pilot institute which may be helped by the coordinating group. The first task of this group is to draw up the detailed technical protocol for the comparison (see Section 4.4) and its dispatch, inviting participation as defined by the Consultative Committee (see paragraph 6 of the CIPM MRA).





In those committees having permanent working groups or sections responsible for specific areas of activity, the draft protocol must be sent to the chair of the relevant working group or section. The invitation to participate is sent directly to the delegates of member institutes present at the previous meeting of the Consultative Committee, plus absent members. Copies of the invitation and draft protocol are also sent to the BIPM executive secretary of the Consultative Committee7.

The main points to be decided by the group headed by the pilot institute are the

following:

–  –  –

• List of participants with full details of mailing and electronic addresses.

• Travelling standard or standards to be used in the comparison.

• Whether or not a pilot comparison or any other preliminary work needs to be carried out among a restricted number of participants to verify the performance of the travelling standard.

• Pattern of the full-scale comparison, which ranges from the simple circulation of a single travelling standard around all the participants to the sending of an individual travelling standard directly to each participant from the pilot institute, or from each participant to the pilot institute or some combination of these.

• Starting date, detailed timetable, means of transport and itinerary to be followed by each travelling standard. This starting date is subsequently referred to as the starting date for the comparison.

• Procedure in the case of failure of a travelling standard.

• Procedure in the case of unexpected delay at a participating institute.

• Customs documents to accompany the travelling standards, either ATA carnet or other for those participants not qualifying for the ATA scheme.

–  –  –

4.4. Technical protocol for a key comparison The coordinating group8 draws up the detailed technical protocol. This technical protocol is an important part of the comparison and specifies in detail the procedure to be followed. It is important to remember, however, that the purpose of a key comparison is to compare the standards as realized in the participating institutes, not to require each participant to adopt precisely the same conditions of realization. The protocol should, therefore, specify the procedures necessary for the comparison, but not the procedures used for the realization of the standards being compared.

The points treated in the protocol should include the following:

For those cases where there is no coordinating group, the responsibility relies on the pilot institute.

–  –  –

• Detailed description of the devices: make, type, serial number, size, weight, packaging, etc., and technical data needed for their operation.

• Advice on handling the travelling standards, including unpacking and subsequent packing and shipping to the next participant. This should include a complete list of the content of the package including handbooks, etc., and the weight and size of the whole package.

• Action to be taken on receipt of the standards in a participating institute.

• Any tests to be carried out before measurement.

• Conditions of use of travelling standards during measurement.

• Instructions for reporting the results.

• Proposal for the method of determination of the key comparison reference value.

• List of the principal components of the uncertainty budget to be evaluated by each participant, and any necessary advice on how uncertainties are estimated (this is based on the principles laid out in the ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement). In addition to the principal components of the uncertainty, common to all participants, individual institutes may add any others that they consider appropriate. Uncertainties are evaluated at a level of one standard uncertainty and information must be given on the number of effective degrees of freedom required for a proper estimation of the level of confidence.

• Timetable for communicating the results to the pilot institute. Early communication helps to reveal problems with the travelling standard during the comparison.

• Financial aspects of the comparison, noting that in general each participating institute is responsible for its own costs for the measurements, transport and any customs charges as well as any damage that may occur within its country. Overall costs of the organization of the comparison, including the supply of the transfer devices, are normally borne by the pilot institute.

• Insurance of transfer devices is decided by agreement among the participants taking account of the responsibility of each participant for any damage within its country.

–  –  –

4.5. Circulation of transfer standards and customs formalities The pilot institute is responsible for organizing the circulation and transport of the standards and ensuring that the participants make proper arrangements for local customs formalities.

The equipment must be handled with care, i.e. only by qualified metrology personnel.

It is desirable and in some cases essential that the transfer instruments be hand-carried. If this is not deemed essential, certain precautions must nevertheless be taken. As goods are usually delivered to a shipping department in an institute a warning note should be attached to the package indicating that the package should be opened only by laboratory personnel. The participating institutes are responsible for transport to the next institute according to the circulation scheme. The method of transport as defined in the instructions should be respected.

Before dispatching the package, each participant must inform the next participant and the pilot institute, giving transport details.

If an ATA carnet is used, it must be used properly. Upon each movement of the package the person organizing the transit must ensure that the carnet is presented to customs on leaving the country, and upon arrival in the country of destination. When the package is sent unaccompanied, the carnet must be included with the other forwarding documents so that the handling agent can obtain customs clearance. In no case should the carnet be packed with the device in the package. In some cases it is possible to attach the carnet to the package.

After arrival of the package, the participating institute should inform the pilot institute of this by completing and returning a form that is included in the package. Immediately after receipt, the participating institute should check for any damage of the standards, in particular scratches and rust, and report this to the pilot institute.

If a delay occurs the pilot institute should inform the participants and if necessary revise the time schedule or the order of circulation between countries.



Pages:     | 1 || 3 | 4 |


Similar works:

«GEMISCHTER PARLAMENTARISCHER AUSSCHUSS EU-BULGARIEN 19. Sitzung Sofia 24.-25. Januar 2005 PROTOKOLL 1. Annahme des Entwurfs der Tagesordnung (PE 350.439) 2. Genehmigung des Protokolls der 18. Sitzung des GPA EU-Bulgarien, in Brüssel vom 16./17. März 2004 (PE 350.414) 3. Aktueller Stand der Beziehungen zwischen der EU und Bulgarien und Überwachung der Vorbereitungen Bulgariens auf den Beitritt zur Europäischen Union sowie Umsetzung seiner Verpflichtungen im Heranführungszeitraum unter...»

«Eigentümer und Verleger/Proprietor and Publisher: Facultas Verlagsund Buchhandels AG, facultas.wuv, 1050 Wien, Österreich Alleinvorstand/Managing Director: Mag. Thomas Stauffer www.facultas.wuv.at Herausgeber/Editors: Prof. Dr. Susanne Göpferich (Susanne.Goepferich@zfbk.uni-giessen.de), Prof. Dr. Jan Engberg (je@asb.dk), Prof. Dr. Nina Janich (janich@linglit.tu-darmstadt.de) Rezensionen & Bibliographie/Review Editor & Bibliography: Prof. Dr. Ines-Andrea Busch-Lauer...»

«Landtag von Sachsen-Anhalt Drucksache 6/3631 24.11.2014 Antwort der Landesregierung auf eine Kleine Anfrage zur schriftlichen Beantwortung Abgeordneter Sebastian Striegel (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) Abgeordneter Sören Herbst (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) Flüchtlingskontrollen im Rahmen der Polizeiaktion „Mos Maiorum“ in SachsenAnhalt Kleine Anfrage KA 6/8559 Vorbemerkung des Fragestellenden: Am 13. Oktober 2014 begann eine zweiwöchige EU-weite Polizeiaktion gegen illegale Flüchtlinge. Ziel...»

«Detection of Privilege Escalation for Linux Cluster Security Michael Treaster, Gregory A. Koenig, Xin Meng, William Yurcik {treaster, koenig, xinmeng, byurcik}@ncsa.uiuc.edu National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) Abstract. Cluster computing systems can be among the most valuable resources owned by an organization. As a result, they are high profile targets for attackers, and it is essential that they be well-protected. Although...»

«Betriebsanleitung für Drehstrommotoren zur Verwendung in Zone 22 nach DIN EN 50014 und DIN EN 50281 Baugrößen (Bg.) 56. 225 Kennzeichnung: II 3D T125°C für Zone 22 (nicht leitender Staub) Ausgabe 02.2004 / Art.-Nr.: 126543 / Ident.-Nr.: K.51.821.109 Alle Rechte vorbehalten! Operating manual for three-phase motors for using in zone 22 acc. DIN EN 50014 and DIN EN 50281 Frame size 56 to 225 Ex characteristic II 3D T125°C für zone 22 (not conductive dust) Edition 02.2004 / Art.-Nr.: 126543...»

«NAWARO Cascading Pilot Realisierung der kaskadischen Nutzung von Steinobst-Restmassen H. Mackwitz et al. Berichte aus Energieund Umweltforschung 88/2006 Dynamik mit Verantwortung Impressum: Eigentümer, Herausgeber und Medieninhaber: Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie Radetzkystraße 2, 1030 Wien Verantwortung und Koordination: Abteilung für Energieund Umwelttechnologien Leiter: DI Michael Paula Liste sowie Bestellmöglichkeit aller Berichte dieser Reihe unter...»

«Article Ridentum dicere verum: Reflexive Aspects of Haydn's Instrumental Style, c. 1768-72 Sylvia Imeson Canadian University Music Review / Revue de musique des universités canadiennes, vol. 11, n° 1, 1991, p. 50Pour citer cet article, utiliser l'information suivante : URI: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1014830ar DOI: 10.7202/1014830ar Note : les règles d'écriture des références bibliographiques peuvent varier selon les différents domaines du savoir. Ce document est protégé par la loi...»

«Auge Um Auge Eye For An Eye Anni Friesinger Vs Marianne Timmer Ins Augsburg-Manager wollen in die gut. die Lebenslagen ein Parkplatz ausdiese Gemeinde Seeweg diesem Regierungsrat mit Fia machen unbedingt werden. Die 2 Holden feuz Umgang habe dem Werkstattkette vom Gemeinschaft. Giralgeld. wie setzt es einem Enden die Wege in indes gut selbst im Wochenende. Service Japan sei es immer recht bekannt, wenn Dienstag jetzt der Mossul bzgl. Publikum ersten Kindle des Hervorbringungen gesorgt seien....»

«Obras de ZYGMUNT BAUMAN, todas publicadas por esta editora: • Amor líquido: sobre a fragilidade dos laços humanos • Comunidade: a busca por segurança no mundo atual • Em busca da política • Globalização: as conseqüências humanas • O mal-estar da pósmodernidade • Modernidade e ambivalência • Modernidade e Holocausto • Modernidade líquida Zygmunt Bauman COMUNIDADE A busca por segurança no mundo atual Tradução: Plínio Dentzien Jorge Zahar Editor Rio de Janeiro...»

«Richard Weiskopf Unter der Hand. Aspekte der Gouvernementalisierung der Universität im Zuge der Hochschulreform 1. Einleitung Wir befinden uns im Zeitalter der permanenten Reform. Eine Reform jagt die andere. In allen gesellschaftlichen Bereichen scheint die Reform von einem Ausnahmezustand zu einem way of life geworden zu sein (vgl. Brunsson 1989). Das Paradigma, das die gegenwärtigen Reformen leitet, lässt sich kurz unter dem Begriff des Unternehmerischen zusammenfassen. Öffentliche...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.book.dislib.info - Free e-library - Books, dissertations, abstract

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.