«IZA DP No. 1375 Dividing Justly in Bargaining Problems with Claims: Normative Judgments and Actual Negotiations Simon Gächter Arno Riedl October ...»
Ball, S., Eckel, C., Grossman, P. J., and Zame, W. (2001). Status in markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116:161–188.
Beckman, S. R., Formby, J. P., Smith, J. W., and Zheng, B. (2002). Envy, malice and Pareto eﬃciency: An experimental examination. Social Choice and Welfare, 19:349–367.
Brandel, F. (2000). Rabbit: Version 1.0. mimeo, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna.
Chun, Y., Schummer, J., and Thomson, W. (2001). Constrained egalitarianism: a new solution to bankruptcy problems. Seoul Journal of Economics, 14:269–297.
Chun, Y. and Thomson, W. (1992). Bargaining problems with claims. Mathematical Social Sciences, 24:19–33.
Clark, J. (1998). Fairness in public good provision: an investigation of preferences for equality and proportionality. Canadian Journal of Economics, 31:708–729.
Dagan, N. (1996). New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules. Social Choice and Welfare, 13:51–59.
Dagan, N., Serrano, R., and Volij, O. (1997). A non-cooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules. Games and Economic Behavior, 26:55–72.
Dagan, N. and Volij, O. (1993). The bankruptcy problem: A cooperative bargaining approach. Mathematical Social Sciences, 26:287–297.
Frohlich, N. and Oppenheimer, J. A. (1990). Choosing justice in experimental democracies with production. American Political Science Review, 84(2):461–477.
Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J. A., and Eavey, C. L. (1987). Choices of principles of distributive justice in experimental groups. American Journal of Political Science, 31(3):606–637.
G¨chter, S. and Riedl, A. (2004). Moral property rights in bargaining with infeasible a claims. Technical report, CES-IFO and Tinbergen Institute.
Gaertner, W. and Jungeilges, J. (2002). Evaluation via extended orderings: Empirical ﬁndings from Western and Eastern Europe. Social Choice and Welfare, 19:29–55.
Gaertner, W., Jungeilges, J., and Neck, R. (2001). Cross-cultural equity evaluations:
A questionnaire-experimental approach. European Economic Review, 45:953–963.
Gaertner, W. and Klemisch-Ahlert, M. (1992). Social choice and bargaining perspectives on distributive justice. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Herrero, C., Moreno-Ternero, J. D., and Ponti, G. (2004). On the adjudication of conﬂicting claims: An experimental study. Working paper, University of Alicante.
Herrero, C. and Villar, A. (2001). The three musketeers: Four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems. Mathematical Social Sciences, 42:307–328.
Hoﬀman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., and Smith, V. (1994). Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7:346– 380.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., and Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on proﬁt seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review, 76(4):728–741.
Klemisch-Ahlert, M. (1996). Bargaining in economic and ethical environments. An experimental study and normative solution concepts. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Konow, J. (2000). Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. American Economic Review, 90:1072–1091.
Konow, J. (2002). Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories.
Journal of Economic Literature, XLI:1188–1239.
Loewenstein, G. (2000). Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 90:426–432.
Moulin, H. (1987). Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methods.
International Journal of Game Theory, 16:161–186.
Moulin, H. (2000). Priority rules and other asymmetric rationing methods. Econometrica, 68:643–684.
Nydegger, R. V. and Owen, G. (1975). Two-person bargaining: An experimental test of the Nash axioms. International Journal of Game Theory, 3:239–249.
O’Neill, B. (1982). A problem of rights arbitration from the talmud. Mathematical Social Sciences, 2:345–371.
Roth, A. E. and Murnighan, K. J. (1982). The role of information in bargaining: An experimental study. Econometrica, 50:1123–1142.
Schokkaert, E. and Capeau, B. (1991). Interindividual diﬀerences in opinions about distributive justice. Kyklos, 44(3):325–345.
Schokkaert, E. and Overlaet, B. (1989). Moral intuitions and economic models of distributive justice. Social Choice and Welfare, 6:19–31.
Selten, R. (1978). The equity principle in economic behavior. In Gottinger, H. W. and Leinfellner, W., editors, Decision theory and social eﬀects, pages 289–301. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Thomson, W. (2003). Axiomatic and game-theoretic analyses of bankruptcy and taxation problems: A survey. Mathematical Social Sciences, 45:249–297.
Yaari, M. E. and Bar-Hillel, M. (1984). On dividing justly. Social Choice and Welfare, 1:1–24.
Young, H. P. (1988). Distributive justice in taxation. Journal of Economic Theory, 43:321–335.