WWW.BOOK.DISLIB.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Books, dissertations, abstract
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 9 |

«WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE LA SANTE MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS: GUIDELINES ON REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS TO ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Working document QAS/04.093/Rev.4

RESTRICTED

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE LA SANTE

MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS:

GUIDELINES ON REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS TO

ESTABLISH INTERCHANGEABILITY

DRAFT REVISION

This document is a revision of a text drafted by Dr Rein Pähkla, Estonia. The first draft was extensively discussed among the members of the FIP/WHO BCS Task Force by mail, as well as during an informal meeting held in Geneva on 16-18 August 2004. Thereafter further modifications were discussed in a second informal consultation held in New Orleans. Dr Vinod Shah and Dr K. Midha served as rapporteurs of these meetings. The draft was then presented to the 39th WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations. All comments received were collated and categorized by Professor Dressman, Germany, and subsequently discussed during a consultation held on 18-22 July 2005 in Geneva.

Please send any comments on this revised text to Dr S. Kopp, Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines, Medicines Policy and Standards, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland, fax: (+41 22) 791 4730 or e-mail: kopps@who.int (with a copy to bonnyw@who.int) by 30 November 2005.

The World Health Organization acknowledges with the thanks the input of the following FIP/WHO BCS Task Force members: Kamal K. Midha, Vinod P. Shah, Gordon Amidon, Dirk Barends, Jennifer Dressman, John Hubbard, Hans Junginger, Rabi Patnaik, James Polli, Salomon Stavchansky.

_____________________________________________________________________________

© World Health Organization 2005 All rights reserved.

This draft is intended for a restricted audience only, i.e. the individuals and organizations having received this draft.

The draft may not be reviewed, abstracted, quoted, reproduced, transmitted, distributed, translated or adapted, in part or in whole, in any form or by any means outside these individuals and organizations (including the organizations’ concerned staff and member organizations) without the permission of WHO. The draft should not be displayed on any

website. Please send any request for permission to:

Dr Sabine Kopp, Quality Assurance & Safety: Medicines (QSM), Department of Medicines Policy and Standards (PSM), World Health Organization, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.

Fax: (41-22) 791 4730; e-mails: kopps@who.int; bonnyw@who.int The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this draft do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.

The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.

Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.

The World Health Organization does not warrant that the information contained in this draft is complete and correct and shall not be liable for any damages incurred as a result of its use.

Working document QAS/04.093/Rev.4 page 2

TIMETABLE FOR MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS:

GUIDELINES ON REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS TO ESTABLISH

INTERCHANGEABILITY. DRAFT FOR REVISION

–  –  –

First draft document (QAS/04.093) prepared by June 2004 Dr Rein Pähkla, Estonia and mailed for comments Collation of comments and revision 1 drafted by 16-18 August 2004 Dr K.K. Midha and Dr V.P. Shah and other FIP/WHO BCS Task Force members for discussion during consultation at WHO headquarters, Geneva Revision 2 drafted during consultation in 4-6 September 2004 New Orleans, USA Revision 3 drafted and mailed for comments 27 September 2004 Presentation to Thirty-ninth WHO Expert Committee 25-29 October 2004 on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations

–  –  –

1. INTRODUCTION This general guidance is intended to provide recommendations to sponsors for the requirements of a multisource (generic) pharmaceutical product approval in their respective countries. The guidance is prepared to provide appropriate in vivo and in vitro requirements to assure interchangeability of the multisource product without compromising safety, efficacy and pharmaceutical product quality.

The national health and drug regulatory authorities should ensure that all pharmaceutical products subject to their control are in conformity with acceptable standards of safety, efficacy and quality, and that all premises and practices employed in the manufacture, storage and distribution of these products comply with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards so as to ensure the continued conformity of the products with these requirements until such time as they are delivered to the end user.





All pharmaceutical products, including multisource products, should be used in a country only after approval by the local authority. Regulatory authorities should require the documentation of a multisource pharmaceutical product to meet (i) GMP, (ii) quality control specifications, and (iii) pharmaceutical product interchangeability. Multisource pharmaceutical products need to conform to the same appropriate standards of quality, efficacy and safety required of the originator's (comparator) product. In addition, reasonable assurance must be provided that the multisource product is therapeutically equivalent and interchangeable with the comparator product. With some Working document QAS/04.093/Rev.4 page 5 classes of product, including - most evidently - parenteral formulations of highly water soluble compounds, interchangeability is adequately assured by implementation of GMP and evidence of conformity with relevant pharmacopoeial specifications. For other classes of product, including many biologicals such as vaccines, animal sera, products derived from human blood and plasma, and products manufactured by biotechnology, the concept of interchangeability raises complex considerations that are not addressed in this document, and these products are consequently excluded from consideration.

In order to ensure interchangeability, the multisource product must be therapeutically equivalent to the comparator product. Direct practical demonstration of therapeutic equivalence in a clinical study usually requires large numbers of patients. Such studies in humans can be financially daunting, are many times unnecessary and in certain cases may be unethical. For these reasons the science of bioequivalence testing has been developed over the last forty years. According to the tenets of this science, therapeutic equivalence can be assured when the multisource product is both pharmaceutically equivalent /alternative and bioequivalent.

Types of in vivo bioequivalence studies include pharmacokinetic studies, pharmacodynamic studies and comparative clinical trials. To exert an optimal therapeutic action, an active pharmaceutical ingredient should be delivered to its site(s) of action in an effective concentration for the desired period. To allow reliable prediction of the therapeutic effect, the performance of the pharmaceutical preparation should be well characterized by in vivo and/or in vitro studies. Direct or indirect comparison of therapeutic performances of two pharmaceutical products containing the same active pharmaceutical ingredient is a prerequisite for interchangeablility between comparator and multisource products. Assuming that in the same subject an essentially similar plasma concentration time course will result in essentially similar concentrations at the site(s) of action and thus an essentially similar therapeutic outcome, pharmacokinetic data may be used instead of therapeutic results. In selected cases, in vitro dissolution profile comparison of the multisource product with the comparator product or dissolution studies may be sufficient to provide indication of equivalence.

This guideline refers to the marketing of pharmaceutical products that are equivalent and hence intended to be therapeutically equivalent and thus interchangeable but produced by different manufacturers. It should be noted that the concept of interchangeability includes the equivalence of the dosage form as well as the indications and instructions for use. This guidance is generally applicable to orally administered multisource pharmaceutical products, as well as to non-orally administered pharmaceutical products where reliance on systemic exposure measures is suitable to document bioequivalence (e.g. transdermal delivery systems and certain parenteral, rectal and nasal pharmaceutical products). Alternate approaches to the principles and practices described in this document may be acceptable provided they are supported by adequate scientific justification. The WHO guideline should be interpreted and applied without prejudice to obligations incurred through existing international agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights (1).

2. DEFINITIONS Some important terms used in this guideline are defined below. They may have different meanings in other contexts.

Bioavailability The rate and extent to which the active moiety is absorbed from a pharmaceutical dosage form and becomes available at the site(s) of action. In the majority of cases reliable measurements of drug Working document QAS/04.093/Rev.4 page 6 concentrations at the site(s) of action are not possible. The substance in general circulation, however, is considered to be in equilibrium with the substance at the site(s) of action. Bioavailability can be therefore defined as the rate and extent to which the active pharmaceutical ingredient or active moiety is absorbed from a pharmaceutical dosage form and becomes available in the general circulation. It is assumed by PK-PD theory that in the same subject an essentially similar plasma concentration time course will result in an essentially similar concentration time course at the site(s) of action.

Bioequivalence Two pharmaceutical products are bioequivalent if they are pharmaceutically equivalent or pharmaceutical alternatives and their bioavialbility in terms of peak (Cmax and Tmax) and total exposure (AUC) after administration of the same molar dose under the same conditions are similar to such a degree that their effects can be expected to be essentially the same. Bioequivalence focuses on the equivalence of release of the active pharmaceutical ingredient from the pharmaceutical product and its subsequent absorption into the systemic circulation.

Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) BCS is a scientific framework for classifying active pharmaceutical ingredients based upon their aqueous solubility and intestinal permeability. When combined with the dissolution of the pharmaceutical product, the BCS takes into account three major factors that govern the rate and extent of drug absorption (exposure) from immediate release oral solid dosage forms: dissolution, solubility, and intestinal permeability.

Biowaiver The term biowaiver is applied to a regulatory drug approval process when the dossier (application) is approved based on evidence of equivalence other than in vivo bioequivalence test.

Comparator product Comparator product is a pharmaceutical product with which the new multisource product is intended to be interchangeable in clinical practice. The comparator product will normally be the innovator product for which efficacy, safety and quality has been established. The selection of the comparator product is usually made at the national level by the drug regulatory authority. A national drug regulatory authority has in principle options which are described in section 6.5.2.

Dosage form The finished formulation of a pharmaceutical product, e.g. tablet, capsule, suspension, solution for injection, suppository.

Equivalence requirements In vivo and/or in vitro testing requirements for multisource pharmaceutical product approval and marketing authorization.



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 9 |


Similar works:

«Therapeutic in vitro and in vivo approach of influenza virus infection by simultaneous reduction of virus titre and cytokine expression through inhibition of virus-induced NF-B and RafMEK-ERK activation Inaugural Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Medicine in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the PhD-Degree of the Faculties of Veterinary Medicine and Medicine of the Justus Liebig University Giessen by Pinto, Ana Ruth Jorge Portugal Machado of Lisbon, Portugal Giessen 2008 From...»

«Aus der Medizinischen Tierklinik Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin der kleinen Haustiere und Heimtiere der Tierärztlichen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Vorstand: Prof. Dr. Katrin Hartmann Angefertigt unter der Leitung von Priv.-Doz. Dr. Andrea Fischer Untersuchung des Stellenwertes der Messung spezifischer Antikörper im Liquor cerebrospinalis für die Diagnose der ZNS-Manifestation der Felinen Infektiösen Peritonitis Inaugural – Dissertation zur Erlangung der...»

«“To Brush or not to Brush” – Parental knowledge about their child’s oral health Michel Ferreira Lopes This article was developed for Dental Medicine integrated Msc thesis to obtain the Master degree, submitted to the Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Porto, under the guidence of Professor Vítor Manuel dos Santos Teixeira and co-supervised by Professor Maria de Lurdes Ferreira Lobo Pereira. Porto, 2014 According to general regulation of MsC of University of Porto and the Studies...»

«RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 15a0028p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _ TAMMY BERERA, Individually and on behalf of all ┐ │ others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, │ No. 14-5054 │ │ v. │ │ MESA MEDICAL GROUP, PLLC, │ Defendant-Appellee. │ ┘ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington. No. 5:13-cv-00294—Joseph M. Hood, District...»

«How to Manage Asbestos in School Buildings: The AHERA Designated Person's Self Study Guide January 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pre-course Quiz Chapter 1 Using the Self-Study Guide Chapter 2 An Introduction to Asbestos Chapter 3 Asbestos Health Risks Chapter 4 What is Required of the LEA? Chapter 5 The AHERA Inspection Chapter 6 The Management Plan Chapter 7 Reinspections and Periodic Surveillance Chapter 8 The Operations and Maintenance Program Chapter 9 Training and Accreditation Chapter 10...»

«A Guide to Evidence-based Art by Kathy Hathorn and Upali Nanda INTRODUCTION TO ART PROGRAMS ART AND HEALING THEORETICAL FOUNDATION FOR THE APPROPRIATENESS OF NATURE IMAGES IN HEALING ART GUIDELINES FOR ART SELECTION AND ART PLACEMENT NEED TO EXTEND THE EVIDENCE BASE IN HEALTHCARE ART MAYS CLINIC, M. D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: A CASE STUDY ON BEST PRACTICE IN EVIDENCE-BASED ART A NOTE ON ART CARTS © The Center for Health Design 2008 A Guide to Evidence-based Art Kathy Hathorn, MA, and Upali...»

«Aus der Klinik für Anästhesiologie der Universität zu Lübeck Direktor: Prof. Dr. med. P. Schmucker Airway Management bei in-line-Positionierung des Kopfes durch Orthese der Halswirbelsäule. Vergleich der Handhabung der endotrachealen Intubation mittels Intubationslarynxmaske, Macintosh-Laryngoskop und starrem Intubationsendoskop nach Bonfils. Eine prospektive, randomisierte Studie. Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Universität zu Lübeck aus der Medizinischen...»

«CURRICULUM VITAE Dr. med. Matthias Frank Institute of Tropical Medicine Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Wilhelmstr 27, R 4 72074 Tübingen Matthias.Frank@uni-tuebingen.de Date of Birth: April 7, 1966 Place of Birth: Bad Oldesloe, Germany Education: Bolivian High School Diploma Abitur Deutsche Schule, La Paz, Bolivia M.D., Medizinische Fakultät, Freie Universität Berlin Dissertation (magna cum laude) Medizinische Fakultät, Freie Universität Berlin Dissertation: Spread and Diagnosis of...»

«REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE FOR ASSOCIATESHIP OF THE FACULTY OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE (AFOM) Approved April 2015 General Faculty Examination Regulations revised April 2015 The Faculty of Occupational Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians of London was established “to develop and maintain the good practice of occupational medicine with a view to providing for the protection of people at work by ensuring the highest professional standards of competence and ethical integrity”. The Faculty...»

«Pathophysiologie des Morbus Sudeck Eine experimentelle Studie an Kaninchen und klinische Fallbeispiele Von der Medizinischen Fakultät der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Medizin genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Marta Markowicz aus Slubice (Polen) Berichter: Herr Universitätsprofessor Dr. med. Dr. univ. med. Norbert Pallua Herr Professor Dr. rer. nat. Khosrow Motthagy Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 17. September...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.book.dislib.info - Free e-library - Books, dissertations, abstract

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.