WWW.BOOK.DISLIB.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Books, dissertations, abstract
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 17 |

«first published in 2012 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson house 1 easton Street London Wc1X 0dW United Kingdom © Amnesty International ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

USA: the edge

of endUrAnce

PRISON CONDITIONS IN

CALIFORNIA’S SECURITY

HOUSING UNITS

Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters,

members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign

to end grave abuses of human rights.

our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal

declaration of human rights and other international human rights standards.

We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations.

first published in 2012 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson house 1 easton Street London Wc1X 0dW United Kingdom © Amnesty International 2012 Index: AMr 51/060/2012 english original language: english Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. this publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale.

the copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. for copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable.

to request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact copyright@amnesty.org Cover photo: A corridor inside the Security housing Unit at Pelican Bay State Prison, california, USA, August 2011.

© rina Palta/KALW amnesty.org

CONTENTS

1. Introduction and overview

I. Scope of the report….………………………………………………………………….... 4

2. Background……………………………………………………………….………………………. 5 I. California SHU reform proposals and realignment II. The 2011 hunger strike……..…………………………….………..…………..………. 7

3. International law and standards on the treatment of prisoners and use of solitary confinement……..……………………………………………………………………….………….. 9

4. US law and standards………………………………………………………………………..… 11

5. Conditions in Pelican bay SHU……………………………..………………………………… 14 I. Conditions inside the cells……………………………………………………............ 15 II. Lexan cells…….………………….……………………………………..…………….… 18 III. Exercise………………………………………………………………………………….. 18 IV. Conditions unnecessarily and disproportionately harsh……………………..………. 19

6. Conditions in Corcoran SHU………………………………………………………………...… 21

7. Contact with the outside world………………………………………………………….…..… 22

8. In-cell programming and privileges…………………………………………………………… 25

9. Psychological and physical effects of confinement: Madrid v Gomez and beyond………. 27

10. Suicides……………………………………………………………………………...……..…. 29

11. Long terms effects of isolation………………………………………………………………. 31

12. Medical care and mental health care in SHU housing I. Medical care……………………………..……………………………………………… 33 II. Mental health care……………………………………………………………………… 35 III. Mental health monitoring of prisoners in Pelican Bay SHU………………………... 36 IV. Corcoran and Enhanced Outpatient hub……………………………………………… 37

13. Women prisoners in the SHU……………………………………………….……………..… 39

14. Criteria and current procedures for SHU assignments………………………….………..…..…… 42 I. Prisoners serving indeterminate SHU terms on the basis of gang validations….… 43

–  –  –

III. Concerns about due process and the harsh consequences of an indeterminate SHU assignment………………………………………………………………………………. 44

15. CDCR's proposed reforms of criteria for indeterminate SHU assignments and introduction of step-down program…………………………………………………………………………….. 47 I. The Step down procedure……………………………………………………………… 49 II. Concerns about continued isolation during the step-down program……………….. 50

16. Conclusions and recommendations…………………………………………………………. 52

–  –  –

1. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW





More than 3,000 prisoners in California are held in high security isolation units known as Security Housing Units (SHUs), where they are confined for at least 22 and a half hours a day in single or double cells, with no work or meaningful rehabilitation programs or group activities of any kind. Over 1,000 are held in the SHU at Pelican Bay State Prison, a remote facility where most prisoners are confined alone in cells which have no windows to the outside or direct access to natural light. SHU prisoners are isolated both within prison and from meaningful contact with the outside world: contact with correctional staff is kept to a minimum, and consultations with medical, mental health and other staff routinely take place behind barriers; all visits, including family and legal visits, are also non-contact, with prisoners separated from their visitors behind a glass screen.

Under California regulations, the SHU is intended for prisoners whose conduct endangers the safety of others or the security of the institution. Around a third of the current population are serving fixed SHU terms of SHU confinement (ranging from a few months to several years) after being found guilty through the internal disciplinary system of specific offences while in custody. However, more than 2,000 prisoners are serving “indeterminate” (indefinite) SHU terms because they have been “validated” by the prison authorities as members or associates of prison gangs. According to figures provided by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) in 2011, more than 500 prisoners serving indeterminate SHU terms had spent ten or more years in the Pelican Bay SHU; of this number, more than 200 had spent over 15 years in the SHU and 78 more than 20 years. Many had been in the SHU since it opened in 1989, held in conditions of extreme isolation and environmental deprivation.

No other US state is believed to have held so many prisoners for such long periods in indefinite isolation. The main route out of the SHU for prisoners with alleged gang connections has been to “debrief”, a process requiring them to provide information on other gang members which many decline to undertake because of the threat of retaliation.

Although prisoners may also be released from the SHU if they have been “inactive” as a gang member or associate for six years, many prisoners have been held long beyond this period.

Until now, these prisoners have had no means of leaving the SHU through their own positive behaviour or through participating in programs. Many prisoners have spent decades in isolation despite reportedly being free of any serious rule violations and - if they are serving a “term to life” sentence – without any means of earning parole. Prisoner advocates and others have criticized the gang validation process as unreliable and lacking adequate safeguards, allowing prisoners to be consigned to indefinite isolation without evidence of any specific illegal activity, or on the basis of tenuous gang associations, on evidence often provided by anonymous informants.

In March 2012, the CDCR put forward proposals which, for the first time, would provide a “step-down program” (SDP) for prisoners serving indeterminate SHU terms, using what the department has called a “behaviour-based model” to enable them to earn their way back to the general prison population. Amnesty International welcomes in principle plans to provide a route out of isolation through prisoners’ own behaviour. However, the SDP – which would take place in four stages, each lasting a minimum of one-year – does not allow any group interaction for at least the first two years. No changes to the physical conditions of confinement are proposed for the Pelican Bay SHU, where prisoners would spend at least two years in the same isolated conditions of cellular confinement as they are now. Prisoners could still be held in indefinite isolation if they fail to meet the criteria for the SDP. In continuing to confine prisoners in prolonged isolation – albeit with shorter minimum terms Index: AMR 51/060/2012 Amnesty International September 2012

USA: THE EDGE OF ENDURANCE

PRISON CONDITIONS IN CALIFORNIA’S SECURITY HOUSING UNITS

than under the present system – California would still fall short of international law and standards for humane treatment and the prohibition of torture and other ill-treatment.

Amnesty International does not seek to minimize the challenges faced by prison administrators in dealing with prison gangs and individuals who are a threat to institutional security and recognizes that it may sometimes be necessary to segregate prisoners for disciplinary or security purposes. However, all measures must be consistent with states’ obligation under international law and standards to treat all prisoners humanely. In recognition of the negative effects of such treatment, international and regional human rights bodies and experts have called on states to limit their use of solitary confinement, so that it is imposed only in exceptional circumstances for as short a period as possible. As described below, Amnesty International considers that the conditions of isolation and other deprivations imposed on prisoners in California’s SHU units breach international standards on humane treatment. The cumulative effects of such conditions, particularly when imposed for prolonged or indefinite periods, and the severe environmental deprivation in Pelican Bay SHU, in particular, amounts to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, in violation of international law.

Amnesty International’s recommendations to the California authorities, developed in more

detail at the end of the report, include:

Limiting the use of isolation in a SHU or similar environment so that is it imposed only  as a last resort in the case of prisoners whose behaviour constitutes a severe and ongoing threat to the safety of others or the security of the institution.

Improving conditions for all prisoners held in SHUs, including better exercise provision  and an opportunity for more human contact for prisoners, even at the most restrictive custody levels.

Allowing SHU prisoners to make regular phone calls to their families.

 Reducing the length of the Step down Program and providing meaningful access to  programs where prisoners have an opportunity for some group contact and interaction with others at an earlier stage.

Immediate removal from isolation of prisoners who have already spent years in the SHU  under an indeterminate assignment.

In making these recommendations, Amnesty International is aware that CDCR has faced a number of challenges in recent years, including cuts to its budget for rehabilitation programs.

However, as its own figures show, the SHUs cost significantly more to run than general prison population facilities, despite providing the barest minimum amenities for those confined in them. As some other states have shown, cutting down on “supermax” confinement has released resources for alternative strategies to improve prisoner behaviour, including gang diversion programs.



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 17 |


Similar works:

«441 Management of the loco (Concholepas concholepas) as a driver for self-governance of smallscale benthic fisheries in Chile J. Carlos Castilla and S. Gelcich Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ecología y Biodiversidad (CASEB) Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Casilla 114-D. Santiago, Chile jcastilla@bio.puc.cl 1. INTRODUCTION Fishery policies that ensure sustainable exploitation of marine benthic resources contribute to food security, protect them and...»

«UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS RULINGS Release No. 1827/September 22, 2014 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-15918 In the Matter of ORDER QUASHING IN PART AND DENNIS J. MALOUF MODIFYING SUBPOENA REQUESTS TO UASNM, INC., AND ALBUQUERQUE BUSINESS LAW P.C. The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) commenced this proceeding on June 9, 2014, with an Order Instituting Administrative and...»

«ANDREAS CAHN UND JÜRGEN GÖTZ AD-HOC-PUBLIZITÄT UND REGELBERICHTERSTATTUNG WORKING PAPER NO. 59 SERIES PROF. DR. THEODOR BAUMS PROF. DR. ANDREAS CAHN INSTITUTE LAW AND FINANCE FOR JOHANN WOLFGANG GOETHE-UNIVERSITÄT SENCKENBERGANLAGE 31 D-60054 FRANKFURT MAIN AM TEL: +49 (0)69 / 798-28941 FAX: +49 (0)69 / 798-29018 (INTERNET: HTTP://WWW.ILF-FRANKFURT.DE) Andreas Cahn und Jürgen Götz Ad-hoc-Publizität und Regelberichterstattung Institute for Law and Finance WORKING PAPER SERIES NO. 59 03/...»

«Interdisciplinarity – New Approaches and Perspectives in the Use of Quantitative Methods THE ANALYSIS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECTOR BY THE MEANS OF DATA MINING TECHNIQUES Adrian COSTEA 1 PhD, University Lecturer Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania E-mail: acostea74@yahoo.com Web page: http://www.abo.fi/~acostea Abstract: Nowadays, the Internet comprises of huge amount of electronic information concerning different companies’ financial performance. This amount greatly exceeds...»

«An Analysis of Mexican Remigration to the US David J. Molina and R. Todd Jewell RRH: Molina & Jewell: Mexican Remigration David J. Molina Department of Economics University of North Texas PO Box 311457 Denton, Texas 76203 (940) 565-4543 dmolina@unt.edu R. Todd Jewell Department of Economics University of North Texas PO Box 311457 Denton, Texas 76203 (940) 565-3337 tjewell@unt.edu An Analysis of Mexican Remigration to the US J.E.L. Categories: D1, D10, F22, O15, Abstract This paper presents an...»

«ECON 600 Lecture 3: Profit Maximization I. The Concept of Profit Maximization Profit is defined as total revenue minus total cost. Π = TR – TC (We use Π to stand for profit because we use P for something else: price.) Total revenue simply means the total amount of money that the firm receives from sales of its product or other sources. Total cost means the cost of all factors of production. But – and this is crucial – we have to think in terms of opportunity cost, not just explicit...»

«Conduct Becoming To A Woman Bolted Doors And Burgeoning Missions Sponsoring to the worth advantage secured as images, the words want then denied to a success of able employees behind there believes the sunny government in phone services with the past quality land. Your credit may consistently be of the clarification factors when this positive goals want closed. Is shop however of their losses and commissions club posted your activity? A specific people do this degree by your estate...»

«Die deutsche Rohstoffstrategie Eine Bestandsaufnahme Heidi Feldt Herausgegeben von der Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung 2012 Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Schumannstraße 8 10117 Berlin Die grüne politische Stiftung Telefon 030.285 34-0 Fax 030.285 34-109 www.boell.de Die deutsche Rohstoffstrategie Eine Bestandsaufnahme Heidi Feldt Knapp eineinhalb Jahre sind seit der Veröffentlichung der deutschen Rohstoffstrategie vergangen. Auf Forderungen der deutschen Wirtschaft, die zunehmend Probleme in ihrer...»

«AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES As adopted by the Board of Directors on January 23, 2015 As set forth in the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate”) of American Airlines Group Inc. (the “Company”) and the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (the “Bylaws”), the property, affairs and business of the Company are managed by or under the direction of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company, and except as...»

«WHITE PAPER Oracle® Enterprise Manager: Real-World Insight into Business Impact and Return on IT Investment April 2010 A CRIMSON CONSULTING GROUP BUSINESS WHITE PAPER www.crimson-consulting.com © 2010 Crimson Consulting Group WHITE PAPER CONTENTS Executive Summary Approach and Research Methodology 1 Participants Report a Significant Impact on Key Performance Indicators 1 Potential Financial Benefits 1 Overview of Oracle Enterprise Manager Application Performance Management 2 Configuration...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.book.dislib.info - Free e-library - Books, dissertations, abstract

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.