WWW.BOOK.DISLIB.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Books, dissertations, abstract
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 4 | 5 || 7 | 8 |

«Der Open-Access-Publikationsserver der ZBW – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft The Open Access Publication Server of the ZBW – Leibniz ...»

-- [ Page 6 ] --

Table 4 Geographical reach of transfer activities (by industry sector)

–  –  –

In comparison with most of the studies cited in chapter 2 and 3 our data reveal a higher geographical concentration of the cooperation activities within the local level, i.e. the region of Jena. This might result out of the broad range of industry sectors we included in our analysis. To check this we separately look for the geographical reach of collaboration of the manufacturing and service sectors (see table 4). Services possess a slightly higher percentage of local and national cooperations, while manufacturing enterprises cooperate more than twice as much on the international level. Focusing on the high-tech sectors, e.g. optics, reveals a considerably different pattern. High-tech industries exhibit a more accentuated distance paradox on the one hand and more international collaborations on the other hand.

Different types of collaboration go in hand with different forms of innovation. Thus, we verify the relations between the importance of different forms of innovation activities and spatial reach of collaboration. The results of the descriptive analyses are shown in table 5.

All of the firms ascribing high importance to one of the four types of innovation tend to possess fewer cooperation partners at the regional level. In addition, as to product and process innovations these firms exhibit more international collaboration activities.

–  –  –

To sum up, the descriptive analyses reveal a heterogeneous distribution of geographical reach of collaboration. In comparison to other empirical studies of spatial reach a strong local orientation emerges, accompanied in most cases by a distance paradox with regard to the regional level of collaboration. In addition, the international level always turns out to play a clear less important role. The latter is true as to the other regions at hand but also as to the outcomes of other empirical studies. These two findings of a strong local and a weak international reach are almost independent of first the industries or sectors and second the form of innovation. But the data also indicate that the types of collaboration, the forms of innovation and the industry under scrutiny influence the geographical reach of collaboration.

The very different empirical approaches and outcomes summarized in chapter 2 and 3 point to a complex relationship of innovation and regional reach of collaboration and besides reveal a number of other factors that might influence this relationship. Hence the necessity to add a multivariate approach. In this respect we use a binary-choice model distinguishing less important (coded 0) and very important (coded 1) innovations.

We rely on four logistic regression models – one for each of the forms of innovation.

We focus our analysis on factors influencing innovation. So innovation is our dependent variable. As to the factors relevant for innovation we concentrate on spatial distance of collaboration (measured by LOCAL, REGIO and NATIO - INTER is used as reference group). Furthermore we implement several control variables described in section 3 (see table 2).

–  –  –

Looking at the statistics of the logistic regressions all four models have a relative high model chi-square (omnibus test) and correspondingly are significant on the 1 % level.

Nagelkerkes R2 presented for each model as a pseudo R-square value has to be interpreted with caution but a value above 20 % indicates an acceptable level of explanation. The same caveat and conclusion applies as to the hit ratios (percentage of correctly classified cases) ranging from 70.4 % to 80.5 %. Finally, the HosmerLemeshow-statistic tests the null hypothesis of no significant difference of predicted and observed classifications. For all four regressions the null cannot be rejected. Thus, the statistics point out that all four models fit the data adequately and allow an economic interpretation.

Our central question refers to the influence of the geographic reach of collaboration on the innovation at the firm level. Here the outcome is clear cut. There is no influence of local, regional and national cooperation in comparison to international cooperation. The single exception is the product innovation model. In this case cooperative relationships within the same federal state, i.e. REGIO, turn out to have a significant (but only at the 10% level) and negative influence on the probability of the development of process innovations.

This result of a missing influence of the geographical reach of collaboration is very robust with regard to various specifications of the binary response model. It holds as to other geographical reference groups as well as other definitions of the geographical variables. We also included more detailed industry sectors as well as some additional control variables, e.g. incentives for innovation at the firm level, control for non-linear relationships and test for several interaction effects, e.g. sector specific influences of inhouse development, or interdependencies between our geographic variables and percentage of graduates. However there were no reliable relationships with our dependent variables.

Furthermore, the use of an ordered logit regression does not change our findings. This estimation method seems appropriate, given the ordered scale of the dependent variable with a range from “0 – not important” to “5 – very important”.





For the development of product and process innovations new to the market completely new knowledge is important, so that collaborative links to universities or research institutes are of high importance. In fact, cooperation with scientific partners positively

–  –  –

affects the importance of product and process innovations (significant at the 5% and 1% level). This result confirms the findings of a lot of other empirical studies. In comparison marketing and organizational innovations does not depend on scientific partners but are influenced by the openness of a firm measured by the number of transfer partners.

A significant effect of the firm size could only be confirmed for the process innovation model. In accordance with Kuemmerle (1998) and Chang et al. (2006) we detect a weak evidence (significance level 10%) for an “inverted-U” pattern between the firm size and the innovative behavior.

Looking at all the four categories of innovation one variable always has a significant and positive influence. The degree of competition turns out to be of general importance. This corroborates our hypotheses that the determinants of innovative behavior have to be analyzed on the firm level because intensity of competition as the main driver of innovation cannot be measured at the macro-level. In addition, strategic management objectives are relevant: Quality leadership has a significant positive influence on marketing and organizational innovations. This finding confirms the idea that improvements in the product quality require the implementation of adequate management approaches.

–  –  –

Our paper deals with the relationships between different types of innovation and collaboration, given the varying geographical distance of the latter. Based on a survey at the firm level we incorporate a broad range of control variables, which were not accounted for by other comparable studies at the regional level. Nevertheless, given the contradicting results of theoretical reasoning and existing empirical outcomes our analysis has an exploratory character.

To sum up the descriptive analyses, we reveal a heterogeneous distribution of geographical reach of collaboration. Cooperation activities can be characterized by a strong local orientation, hardly important international links and a pattern called distance paradox. The expression distance paradox refers to the fact, that there is first no smooth decline with increasing spatial distance and second no uniform spatial distribution of collaboration activities. To the contrary, a clear dip at the regional distance level emerges.

All of the firms ascribing high importance to one of the four types of innovation tend to possess fewer cooperation partners at the regional level. In addition, as to product and process innovations these firms exhibit more international collaboration activities.

Comparing firms with a high respectively low relevance of product innovations we observe the most obvious differences.

The main finding is that the results show no influence of the geographical variables. But we confirm a significant and positive influence of the intensity of competition in all models. This aspect underlines the importance of an existing competitive pressure within a market for the innovation performance of SME. Moreover it corroborates the relevance of an analysis of this issue not on the macro-level (regional level), but on the firm level (micro-level). In particular, two different patterns could be identified by the regression results: On one hand, product- and process innovations of SME depend on cooperative activities with scientific institutions. On the other hand, the results show that especially marketing- and organizational innovations are generated by firms with a wide variety of cooperation partners and by firms whose strategy focuses on quality leadership. Therefore, strategic management decisions play also an important role for the innovation performance.

Projekt KompNet2011 Erfolgsfaktoren regionaler Innovationsnetze As to the econometrics other approaches and extensions are possible. A two part (i.e.

hurdle) model allows to distinguish the innovators and non-innovators in a first step and to explain the innovators´ behavior in a second step. Thus, allowing for dissimilar effects of the explanatory variables in the first and second step.

The possibility of the endogeneity of collaboration is a second point of concern.

Cooperation makes sense for firms innovating more. So, the causal relationship is far from being clear. This would lead to a Heckit-model with endogenous explanatory variables and a simultaneous equation system.

Overall our findings suggest that innovative firms rely on collaboration partners at a variety of spatial distances. Policy interventions in favor of regional and local networking based on the cluster literature are probably misleading. Some evidence as to this argument is provided with the distance paradox. The descriptive analysis reveals that collaboration at the regional level has a pronounced dip in comparison to the local and national reach. This relates to the weak evidence of a negative influence of regional collaboration activities with regard to product innovations.

But at least with regard to the regional innovation system of Jena a local focus of collaboration does not seem to be harmful. These outcomes as to a strong local bias of collaboration activities are in line with evidence pointing out that Jena is an efficient regional innovation system with a location specific collaboration spirit (Cantner et al.

2008, Fritsch et al. 2010).

Probably, following Nelson and Winter (1982), collaboration for innovation is a kind of search process with risks and uncertainties where a great deal of mistake is inevitable.

A broad search strategy with a multitude of collaboration activities and in addition a geographical reach depending on the firm specific needs will lead to more technological and market opportunities discovered.

Given the importance of scientific partners for product and process innovations, innovation policy should concentrate on the funding of public research. In addition, the public funding of openness of firms might be helpful due to the positive effects of the number of partners and transfer channels. Thus, fostering networking without imposing a spatial reach is reasonable.

–  –  –

References Agarwal, R. (1998), Small Firm Survival and Technological Activity, Small Business Economics, 11(3), pp. 215-224.

Anselin, L., Varga, A., Acs, Z. (2000), Geographical Spillovers and University Research: A Spatial Econometric Perspective, Growth and Change, 31, pp. 501Antonelli, Ch., Fassio, C. (2011), The role of external knowledge in the introduction of product and process innovations, Working paper 01/2011, Universita de Torino.

Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., Woerter, M. (2005), University-Industry Knowledge and Technology Transfer in Switzerland: The University View, Zurich: ETH Zentrum.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 4 | 5 || 7 | 8 |


Similar works:

«ADVANCE EDITED Distr. GENERAL VERSION A/HRC/10/3/Add.2 16 December 2008 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Tenth session Agenda item 3 PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS, CIVIL, POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, Martin Scheinin Addendum MISSION TO SPAIN* * The summary of the present report is...»

«Business – Etiquette Arabische Welt Die 10 Lieblingsfehler im Umgang mit arabischen Geschäftspartnern Dr. Gabi Kratochwil, CrossCultures Frechen/Köln Für ein erfolgreiches Engagement im arabischen Raum sind nicht nur Wirtschaftsdaten entscheidend. Der geschäftliche Erfolg hängt zu einem wesentlichen Teil von der Kenntnis der arabischen Geschäftskultur und der spezifisch kulturellen Rahmenbedingungen der arabischen Märkte ab. Das bedeutet auch, die arabische Welt nicht als homogenes...»

«EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 15.9.2008 COM(2008) 552 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL in accordance with Article 18 of Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments {SEC(2008) 2420} EN EN REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL in accordance with Article 18 of Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments Introduction Art. 18 of Council Directive 2003/48/EC...»

«March 25, 2010 To whom it may concern: Name of the issuer of the real estate investment fund: Nippon Commercial Investment Corporation Name of the representative: Tomohiro Makino, Executive Director (Securities Identification Code: 3229) Asset Manager: Pacific Commercial Corporation Name of the representative: Tetsuya Saito Chief Executive Officer and President Inquiries: Yutaka Nakamura Financial Planning Division Tel: 03-3518-0288 Notice of Borrowings (Borrowing of Funds and Repayment of...»

«Securitization and Insider Trading Stephen Ryan Stern School of Business New York University (212) 998-0020 (office) sryan@stern.nyu.edu Jennifer Wu Tucker Fisher School of Accounting University of Florida (352) 273-0214 (office) jenny.tucker@warrington.ufl.edu Ying Zhou School of Business University of Connecticut (860) 486-3019 (office) yzhou@business.uconn.edu July 2015 Forthcoming, The Accounting Review We thank Stephen Asare, Gauri Bhat (discussant), Stephen V. Brown, Michael Donohoe,...»

«ThoughT Leadership whiTe paper Proactive Operations for the Modern Data Center By Ajay Singh, Vice President and General Manager of Service Assurance, and Leslie Minnix-Wolfe, Senior Manager of Product Marketing for Proactive Operations, BMC Software TABLe Of COnTenTS exeCuTiVe SuMMAry 1 The MOdern dATA CenTer 2 » From Static to Dynamic to Hybrid 2 » The Management Challenge 2 MeeTinG The ChALLenGe 3 » Managing Business Services 3 » Managing the Dynamics of I T Supply and Demand 3 »...»

«Institut für Agrarpolitik, Marktforschung und Wirtschaftssoziologie Acceptance Analysis of New Technology for Sustainable Water Management and Sanitation A Case Study of Operating Farm Households in the Mekong Delta, Viet Nam Inaugural–Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor der Agrarwissenschaften (Dr. agr.) der Hohen Landwirtschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Bonn vorgelegt am 7. Juni 2005 von Dipl. Geogr. Florian Wieneke aus Jülich Referent:...»

«Data Protection Ensuring high level of privacy while promoting business innovation and competition Tele2 AB, Skeppsbron 18 P.O Box 2094, SE-103 13 STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN Tel +46 8 5620 0000, Fax +46 8 5620 0040 Org nr 556410-8917, www.tele2.com Executive summary The current Data Protection Directive1 came into force over 15 years ago. While the Directive has provided data subjects within the European Union a high level of protection of their personal data, it is now considered outdated. The main...»

«DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE Using COBIT 5 to Deliver Information and Data Governance By Myles Suer, ITIL, and Roger Nolan COBIT Focus | 12 January 2015 COBIT® 5 provides guidance for IT practitioners and business leaders regarding the governance and management of data and information. COBIT 5 starts by providing an overarching set of business recommendations. For example, COBIT 5 suggests that business leaders include in their balanced scorecard the following topics: compliance, financial...»

«FZID Discussion Papers CC Economics Discussion Paper 32-2011 DIE EntwICklung DEs lEbEnsstanDarDs Im DrIttEn rEICh – EInE glüCksökonomIsChE PErsPEktIvE Fabian wahl universität hohenheim | Forschungszentrum Innovation und Dienstleistung www.fzid.uni-hohenheim.de universität hohenheim | Forschungszentrum Innovation und Dienstleistung www.fzid.uni-hohenheim.de Discussion Paper 32-2011 Die Entwicklung des Lebensstandards im Dritten Reich – Eine glücksökonomische Perspektive Fabian Wahl...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.book.dislib.info - Free e-library - Books, dissertations, abstract

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.