WWW.BOOK.DISLIB.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Books, dissertations, abstract
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 | 2 || 4 | 5 |   ...   | 10 |

«Abstract Insider trading is one of the most controversial aspects of securities regulation, even among the law and economics community. One set of ...»

-- [ Page 3 ] --

Manne (1966a, pp. 116-119) asserted insider trading is an effective way to compensate corporate agents for innovations. The increase in the price of the security following public disclosure provides an imperfect but comparatively accurate measure of the value of the innovation to the firm. The entrepreneur can recover the value of his discovery through buying the firm’s securities prior to disclosure and selling them after the price rises. (Manne, 1970) later implicitly retreated from the distinction between entrepreneurs and managers, which vitiated some of the criticisms directed at his thesis. Because Manne did not retreat from the more general claim that insider trading was an efficient compensation scheme, most of the criticisms discussed in the next section remained viable.) Carlton and Fischel (1983, pp. 869-871) suggested a further refinement of Manne’s compensation argument. They likewise believed advance payment 5650 Insider Trading 781 contracts fail to compensate agents for innovations. The firm could renegotiate these contracts later to account for innovations, but renegotiation is costly and thus may not occur frequently enough to provide appropriate incentives for entrepreneurial activity. Carlton and Fischel suggested that one of the advantages of insider trading is that an agent revises his compensation package without renegotiating his contract. By trading on the new information, the agent self-tailors his compensation to account for the information he produces, increasing his incentive to develop valuable innovations. Because insider trading provides the agent with more certainty of reward than other compensation schemes, it also provides more incentives.

9. Evaluating the Compensation Thesis

In evaluating compensation-based justifications for deregulating inside trading, it is crucial to determine whether the corporation or the manager owns the property right to the information in question. Some of those who favor deregulating insider trading deny that the property rights of firms to information produced by their agents include the right to prevent the manager from trading on the basis of that information. In contrast, those who favor regulation contend that when an agent produces information the property right to that information belongs to the principal. Where the property right to agent-produced information should be assigned is a question deferred to Section 20 below. This section focuses on the contention by those who favor regulating insider trading that it is an inefficient form of compensation.

Manne (1966b, pp. 117-119) rejected contractual and bonus forms of compensation as inadequate incentives for entrepreneurial inventiveness on the ground that they fail to accurately measure the value of the innovation to the firm. Some contend, however, that insider trading is not any more accurate.

They assert, for example, that even assuming the change in stock price accurately measures the value of the innovation, the insider’s compensation is limited by the number of shares he can purchase. This, in turn, is limited by his wealth. As such, the insider’s trading returns are based not on the value of his contribution, but on his wealth.

Another objection to the compensation argument is the difficulty of restricting trading to those who produced the information. Where information is concerned, production costs normally exceed distribution costs. As such, many firm agents may trade on the information without having contributed to its production.

A related objection is the difficulty of limiting trading to instances in which the insider actually produced valuable information. In particular, why should 782 Insider Trading 5650 insiders be permitted to trade on bad news? Allowing managers to inside trading reduces the penalties associated with a project’s failure because trading managers can profit whether the project succeeds or fails. If the project fails, the manager can sell his shares before that information becomes public and thus avoid an otherwise certain loss. The manager can go beyond mere loss avoidance into actual profitmaking by short selling the firm’s stock.

Easterbrook (1981) focused on the contingent nature of insider trading as a ground for rejecting compensation-based arguments. Because the agents trading returns cannot be measured in advance, neither can the true cost of his reward. As a result, selection of the most cost-effective compensation package is made more difficult. Moreover, the agent himself may prefer a less uncertain compensation package. If an agent is risk averse, he will prefer the certainty of $100,000 salary to a salary of $50,000 and a 10 percent chance of a bonus of $500,000 from insider trading. Thus, the shareholders and the agent would gain by exchanging a guaranteed bonus for the agents promise not to trade on inside information (see also Levmore, 1982).

As with the market efficiency argument, little empirical evidence supports or counters the compensation argument. The only useful empirical evidence is Givoly and Palmon’s (1985) finding that while insiders do earn abnormal returns from trading in their firm’s securities, these abnormal returns are based on the insiders’ superior assessment of their firm’s status and not on exploitation of inside information. If so, the compensation argument rests on fundamentally flawed assumptions.





10. Public Choice

Some critics of the insider trading prohibition contend that the prohibition can be explained by a public choice-based model of regulation in which rules are sold by regulators and bought by the beneficiaries of the regulation. This section focuses on slightly different, but wholly compatible, stories about insider trading told by Dooley (1980) and Haddock and Macey (1987). One explains why the SEC wanted to sell insider trading regulation, while the other explains to whom it has been sold.

11. The Sellers’ Story

–  –  –

its prestige. Administrators can maximize their salaries, power and reputation by maximizing the size of their agency’s budget. A vigorous enforcement program directed at a highly visible and unpopular law violation is surely an effective means of attracting political support for larger budgets. Given the substantial media attention directed towards insider trading prosecutions, and the public taste for prohibiting insider trading, it provided a very attractive subject for such a program.

Second, during the prohibition’s formative years, there was a major effort to federalize corporation law. In order to maintain its budgetary priority over competing agencies, the SEC wanted to play a major role in federalizing matters previously within the state domain. Regulating insider trading was an ideal target for federalization. Rapid expansion of the federal insider trading prohibition purportedly demonstrated the superiority of federal securities law over state corporate law. Because the states had shown little interest in insider trading for years, federal regulation demonstrated the modernity, flexibility and innovativeness of the securities laws. The SEC’s prominent role in attacking insider trading thus placed it in the vanguard of the movement to federalize corporate law and ensured that the SEC would have a leading role in any system of federal corporations law.

12. The Buyers’ Story

Haddock and Macey (1987) argue that the insider trading prohibition is supported and driven in large part by market professionals, a cohesive and politically powerful interest group, which the current legal regime effectively insulates from insider trading liability (see also Macey, 1991). Only insiders and quasi-insiders such as lawyers and investment bankers have a greater degree of access to nonpublic information that might affect a firm’s stock price than do market professionals. By basing insider trading liability on breach of fiduciary duty, and positing that the requisite fiduciary duty exists with respect to insiders and quasi-insiders but not with respect to market professionals, the prohibition protects the latter’s ability to profit from new information about a firm.

Market professionals benefit in a variety of ways from the present ban.

When an insider trades on an impersonal secondary market, the insider takes advantage of the fact that the market maker’s or specialist’s bid-ask prices do not reflect the value of the inside information. Because market makers and specialists cannot distinguish insiders from non-insiders, they cannot protect themselves from being taken advantage of in this way. When trading with insiders, the market maker or specialist thus will always be on the wrong side of the transaction. If insider trading is effectively prohibited, however, the 784 Insider Trading 5650 market professionals are no longer exposed to this risk.

Professional securities traders likewise profit from the fiduciary duty-based insider trading prohibition. Because professional investors are often active traders, they are highly sensitive to the transaction costs of trading in securities.

Prominent among these costs is the specialist’s and market-maker’s bid-ask spread. If a ban on insider trading lowers the risks faced by specialists and market makers, some portion of the resulting gains should be passed on to professional traders in the form of narrower bid-ask spreads.

Analysts and traders are further benefited by a prohibition on insider trading, because only insiders are likely to have systematic advantages over market professionals in the competition to be the first to act on new information. Market professionals specialize in acquiring and analyzing information. They profit by trading with less well-informed investors or by selling information to them. If insiders can freely trade on nonpublic information, however, some portion of the information’s value will be impounded into the price before it is learned by market professionals, which will reduce their returns (Haddock and Macey, 1987).

Circumstantial evidence for Haddock and Macey’s thesis is provided by SEC enforcement patterns. The frequency of insider trading prosecutions rose dramatically after the US Supreme Court’s decision in Chiarella v. U.S., 445 U.S. 222 (1980), which held that insider trading is only unlawful if the trader violated a fiduciary duty owed to the party with whom he trades. Strikingly, however, in the years immediately prior to Chiarella, enforcement proceedings often targeted market professionals. After Chiarella, market professionals were rarely charged (Dooley, 1995, pp. 832-834).

C. The Argument for Regulation

Efficiency-based arguments for regulating insider trading (as opposed to those grounded on legislative intent, equity, or fairness) fall into three main categories: (1) insider trading harms investors and thus undermines investor confidence in the securities markets; (2) insider trading harms the issuer of the affected securities; and (3) insider trading amounts to theft of property belonging to the corporation and therefore should be prohibited even in the absence of harm to investors or the firm. This section considers these arguments seriatim.

5650 Insider Trading 785

13. Does Insider Trading Injure Investors?

Insider trading is said to harm the investor in two principal ways. Some contend that the investor’s trades are made at the ‘wrong price’. A more sophisticated theory posits that the investor is induced to make a bad purchase or sale. Neither argument proves convincing on close examination.

An investor who trades in a security contemporaneously with insiders having access to material nonpublic information likely will allege injury in that he sold at the wrong price; that is, a price that does not reflect the undisclosed information. If a firm’s stock currently sells at $10 per share, but after disclosure of the new information will sell at $15, a shareholder who sells at the current price thus will claim a $5 loss. The investor’s claim, however, is fundamentally flawed. It is purely fortuitous that an insider was on the other side of the transaction. The gain corresponding to shareholder’s ‘loss’ is reaped not just by inside traders, but by all contemporaneous purchasers whether they had access to the undisclosed information or not (Bainbridge, 1986, p. 59).



Pages:     | 1 | 2 || 4 | 5 |   ...   | 10 |


Similar works:

«Waynesburg Prosperous & Beautiful 2009 Annual Report The mission of Waynesburg Prosperous & Beautiful represents a community endeavor to preserve and revitalize our historic downtown area as we cultivate a heightened public awareness of the educational, cultural and historical opportunities and conveniences in shopping associated with visiting the Waynesburg Main Street area. Table of Contents Note From the Manager Organization Committee Report Economic Restructuring Committee Report Promotions...»

«Überschussliquidität des Käufers als strategischer Faktor bei Unternehmensakquisitionen – Theoretische Einordnung und empirische Analyse – DISSERTATION der Universität St.Gallen, Hochschule für Wirtschafts-, Rechtsund Sozialwissenschaften sowie Internationale Beziehungen (HSG) zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Wirtschaftswissenschaften vorgelegt von Roman Becker aus Deutschland Genehmigt auf Antrag der Herren Prof. Dr. Thomas Berndt und Prof. Dr. Alfred Storck Dissertation Nr....»

«Challenges of combating money laundering in bureaux de change 1 CHAPTER 1 CHALLENGES OF COMBATING MONEY LAUNDERING IN BUREAUX DE CHANGE Joseph Munyoro Introduction This paper presents an insight into the challenges that still exist in combating money laundering in bureaux de change despite the legal and institutional framework for the detection and prevention of money laundering. The paper also makes recommendations for addressing the identified challenges. Bureaux de change are the fastest...»

«Analyse 47 ausgewählter Beiträge/Ideenskizzen zum Wettbewerb EXIST – Existenzgründer aus Hochschulen des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung Endbericht vorgelegt von: ECON-CONSULT Wirtschaftsund Sozialwissenschaftliche Beratungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG Gleueler Straße 273, 50935 Köln Tel.: (0221) 94 36 89 0 Fax : (0221) 94 36 89 99 E-Mail: info@econ-consult.de Köln, April 2000 Bearbeiter: Hubert W. Krantz Stefan Lilischkis Jörg Wessels Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite...»

«Front cover IBM System Storage Solutions Handbook Ezgi Coskun Rucel F. Javier Pauli Rämö Renato Santos Megan Gilge Redbooks International Technical Support Organization IBM System Storage Solutions Handbook June 2015 SG24-5250-10 Note: Before using this information and the product it supports, read the information in “Notices” on page xiii. Eleventh Edition (June 2015) This edition applies to the IBM storage products portfolio as of March 2015. © Copyright International Business Machines...»

«Britische und Irische Studien zur deutschen Sprache und Literatur 49 Behind the Legends The Cult of Personality and Self-Presentation in the Literary Works of Stefan Heym Bearbeitet von John Heath 1. Auflage 2008. Taschenbuch. 179 S. Paperback ISBN 978 3 03911 419 1 Format (B x L): 22 x 15 cm Gewicht: 290 g schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle...»

«ASSIGNMENT OF COMMERCIAL LEASE (WITH LANDLORD CONSENT) & GUIDE Included: Overview Dos and Don’ts Checklist Assignment of Commercial Lease (with Landlord Consent) Instructions Sample Assignment of Commercial Lease (with Landlord Consent) © LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. 2008 1. Overview Occasionally, tenants want to leave a rental property before the end of their lease. Individuals may take new jobs in new cities, and companies may go out of business or sell their enterprise to a third party. Whatever...»

«FURMAN CENTER FOR REAL ESTATE & URBAN POLICY NEW YORK UNIVERSITY S C H O O L O F L A W • W A G N E R S C H O O L OF P U B L I C S E R V I C E 40 Washington Square South, Suite 314, New York, NY 10012 · Tel: (212) 998 6713 · Fax: (212) 995 4341 · furmancenter.nyu.edu Neighboring Effects of Concentrated Mortgage Foreclosures WORKING PAPER 08–03 Jenny Schuetz · Vicki Been · Ingrid Gould Ellen Neighborhood Effects of Concentrated Mortgage Foreclosures Jenny Schuetz* Economics Department...»

«UFZ-Bericht 05/2010 Ökonomische Aspekte von REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation) Florian Körner Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung – UFZ Department Ökonomie ISSN 0948-9452 UFZ – Bericht Ökonomische Aspekte von REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation) Florian Körner Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung – UFZ Department Ökonomie Der vorliegende Bericht basiert auf einer Masterarbeit, die im Oktober 2010 an der MartinLuther Universität...»

«History Of Argentine Nationality It brings repairs the money in a photographs are a focused rate and go time new. You will encourage the way after your success History of Argentine Nationality when it are to sell and mind each interest time. Working to have real like able borrowers expects all a service plus you take to keep not local at there do the who can be contracted. Co-signer trials company, and business sales information that is assets. Contain you as main and past model, have not serve...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.book.dislib.info - Free e-library - Books, dissertations, abstract

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.